MTTR (Mean Time to Remediate) Trends

---

1. Day in the Life of an AppSec Engineer Using This Chart

An Application Security (AppSec) Engineer would use this MTTR (Mean Time to Remediate) Trends chart to monitor and improve the efficiency of vulnerability remediation efforts. Here’s how it fits into their daily workflow:

• Morning Security Review:

  • The engineer checks if critical and high-severity vulnerabilities are being remediated within the SLA (dotted line).

  • If the MTTR for critical vulnerabilities is consistently above SLA, they escalate to development teams or security leadership.

• Tracking Vulnerability Remediation Performance:

  • The engineer analyzes how quickly vulnerabilities are being fixed across critical, high, and medium severity levels.

  • If the MTTR for critical vulnerabilities fluctuates, they investigate root causes (e.g., delays in patching, lack of resources, dependency bottlenecks).

• Security Operations Meetings:

  • Uses the chart to present weekly or monthly remediation performance in security meetings.

  • If MTTR is improving, it’s a positive indicator of security maturity; if worsening, it suggests inefficiencies in patching processes.

• Compliance and SLA Adherence:

  • If MTTR for critical or high vulnerabilities exceeds the SLA, the engineer works with teams to expedite fixes and ensure compliance with security frameworks (e.g., PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53).

---

2. Impact on AppSec Operations

This chart plays a critical role in vulnerability management and security governance:

• Enhanced Risk Management:

  • Identifies whether critical vulnerabilities remain unpatched for too long, increasing security exposure.

• SLA Compliance & Governance:

  • Helps ensure that security teams and developers meet remediation SLAs for vulnerabilities.

  • If MTTR exceeds SLA limits, it triggers risk escalation and resource allocation adjustments.

• Continuous Improvement in Security Posture:

  • If the MTTR is reducing over time, it indicates that teams are becoming more efficient in resolving security issues.

  • If MTTR is high, it suggests gaps in remediation processes, automation needs, or lack of developer security awareness.

• Prioritization of Fixes & Resource Allocation:

  • Helps security leaders prioritize urgent fixes, especially for vulnerabilities that exceed SLA thresholds.

  • Can drive decisions to increase automation, allocate more engineers, or integrate DevSecOps practices.

---

3. What Decisions Does This Chart Drive?

• Are vulnerabilities being remediated fast enough?

  • If MTTR for critical vulnerabilities is consistently above SLA, security teams must escalate remediation efforts.

• Is our vulnerability management process improving or degrading?

  • If MTTR is decreasing over time, security teams are getting faster at patching.

  • If MTTR is increasing, it signals remediation delays, bottlenecks, or lack of prioritization.

• Should we escalate security vulnerabilities to leadership?

  • If vulnerabilities regularly exceed SLAs, AppSec teams might need to alert leadership or enforce stricter remediation deadlines.

• Do we need additional security automation or patching resources?

  • If vulnerabilities stay open too long, security teams may need to invest in automated patching solutions or improve DevSecOps integration.

• Which severity level needs more attention?

  • If medium and high-severity vulnerabilities are also taking too long to remediate, policies may need adjustment to ensure they are not ignored in favor of critical issues.