Top Exploitable Vulnerabilities & Affected Applications

1. Day in the Life of an AppSec Engineer Using This Chart
An Application Security (AppSec) Engineer would use this Pareto-style vulnerability distribution chart to identify and prioritize remediation efforts for the most exploitable vulnerabilities affecting applications. Here’s how it fits into their daily workflow:
Morning Security Review:
The engineer checks which Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) are impacting the largest number of applications.
The CVEs at the top of the list (left side) should be the highest priority for remediation.
Vulnerability Prioritization & Risk Reduction:
If a single highly exploitable CVE (e.g., CVE-2024-1004) is affecting a large number of applications, it gets flagged for immediate attention.
Engineers communicate with development teams to ensure fixes are quickly applied across all affected applications.
Security Meetings & Reporting:
Uses this data to discuss top risk factors in weekly security meetings.
Helps in justifying patching urgency to executives or compliance teams.
Patch Management Coordination:
Works with IT and DevSecOps teams to ensure patches for high-impact vulnerabilities are deployed as quickly as possible.
2. Impact on AppSec Operations
This chart significantly improves vulnerability management and security risk assessment by enabling:
Efficient Risk-Based Prioritization:
Focuses remediation efforts on the most widely exploited vulnerabilities, ensuring maximum risk reduction.
Better Remediation Planning:
Helps teams plan batch fixes for multiple applications affected by the same CVE, reducing operational overhead.
Optimized Patch Management:
Security teams can coordinate bulk patching efforts for vulnerabilities that affect many applications simultaneously.
Improved Compliance Posture:
Reducing exposure to widely known vulnerabilities strengthens compliance with security frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, NIST, PCI-DSS, CIS Controls).
Cross-Team Collaboration:
Enables AppSec engineers to proactively engage with developers and infrastructure teams to ensure timely vulnerability remediation.
3. What Decisions Does This Chart Drive?
Which vulnerabilities should be remediated first?
The most impactful CVEs (those affecting the most applications) should be fixed immediately.
Are there systemic security weaknesses across multiple applications?
If multiple applications are affected by the same CVE, it may indicate:
A recurring misconfiguration.
A shared vulnerable dependency (e.g., a vulnerable third-party library).
How should vulnerability patches be rolled out?
The team can group fixes based on CVEs to deploy patches more efficiently across multiple applications.
Is there a need for vendor or third-party coordination?
If certain CVEs are linked to third-party software, security teams may need to engage with vendors for security patches.
Do developers need additional security training?
If a specific vulnerability type keeps recurring, it might indicate a training gap for developers (e.g., insecure coding practices).
Last updated
Was this helpful?