Application Overview

Application Overview


🎯 1. Day in the Life of an AppSec Engineer Using This Chart

An AppSec engineer will:

  • Morning check-in:

    • Review all applications, their Business Ratings, and vulnerability counts at a glance.

    • Focus first on high-business-impact apps (e.g., Application Name 1 with score 98).

  • Prioritize triage:

    • Investigate applications and repositories with the highest number of Critical (red) and High (orange) issues.

  • Pipeline health review:

    • Quickly verify which PBOM scans (e.g., SAST, Secrets, PII, Cloud security) are active for each app and repo via the icons.

  • Assign actions:

    • If an app or repo has critical issues and incomplete PBOM coverage, escalate for immediate remediation, or flag for security champions.

  • Prepare reports:

    • Pull quick numbers for weekly reporting to AppSec leadership or development teams — "Top 5 apps with most criticals."


⚙️ 2. Impact on AppSec Operation

This dashboard view enables:

  • Unified Risk Visibility:

    • Shows the risk posture at the application level with repo drill-down — allowing aggregation and prioritization.

  • Faster SLA tracking:

    • Instantly detect apps that may violate vulnerability remediation SLA based on open critical/high findings.

  • Pipeline Assurance:

    • AppSec engineers can easily validate whether full security testing is integrated across Dev → Build → Deploy pipelines.

  • Business-Context Prioritization:

    • Business rating ensures security teams focus on high-value or customer-facing apps first, not just tech debt.


🚀 3. What Decisions This Chart Drives

  • Which apps are most at risk?

    • Based on critical vulnerability counts combined with Business Rating.

  • Where is PBOM coverage incomplete?

    • Missing icons for phases (e.g., no cloud security scan) triggers follow-up.

  • Which repos under an app need immediate action?

    • Repo-level breakdown shows how risk is distributed internally.

  • Where should resources be allocated?

    • High-risk, business-critical apps (98 rating) take priority for AppSec escalations or audits.

  • Are pipeline security gates working?

    • If PBOM icons show gaps (e.g., no SAST, no IaC scan), need engineering fixes.


🗂️ 5. Detailed Description of the Chart

Field
Meaning

Business Rating

A score (likely 0–100) reflecting app's importance to business. Higher = more critical.

App Name

Application under management. Expanding shows associated repositories.

Issues (Critical, High, Medium)

Colored dots (🔴 critical, 🟠 high, 🟡 medium) with counts for each severity.

PBOM (Pipeline Bill of Materials) Icons

Small icons representing security scans integrated at different phases (e.g., SAST, Secrets detection, PII scan, Cloud security).


🔵 PBOM Icon Interpretation (based on common ASPM practices):

Icon
Likely Represents

Shield

SAST (Static code analysis)

Shield + Lock

Dependency/Package Analysis (SCA)

Expansion Arrows

PII/Secrets scanning

Document

Build Artifact Security (e.g., SBOM generation)

Magnifying Glass

DAST or API Security Scan

Eye Mask

Secrets Management (runtime secrets scan)

Package Shield

Container Security

Cloud Icon

Cloud/IaC Security


🎨 Color Coding for Issue Severity:

Color
Meaning

🔴 Red

Critical vulnerabilities

🟠 Orange

High severity vulnerabilities

🟡 Yellow

Medium severity vulnerabilities


🛠️ Probable Data Sources Feeding This View

(Just briefly, as you asked to exclude deep details)

  • Vulnerability scanners (SAST, DAST, SCA)

  • Secrets scanners

  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanners

  • Cloud posture management tools

  • Repository metadata (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket)

  • Business metadata from CMDB, Jira, or internal app catalogs


📌 Summary

The Application Overview chart gives AppSec engineers a single pane of glass to:

  • Prioritize applications by business risk and security risk.

  • Audit PBOM coverage across dev-build-deploy phases.

  • Triage open criticals quickly across applications and repos.

  • Drive data-driven, business-aligned security decisions — not just fix findings randomly.

Last updated

Was this helpful?