Unified Vulnerability Map

Unified Vulnerability Map Chart

---

1. Day in the Life of an AppSec Engineer Using This Chart

An Application Security (AppSec) Engineer would use this Unified Vulnerability Map to get a holistic view of vulnerabilities across different security domains. Here’s how it fits into their daily workflow:

• Morning Security Review:

  • The engineer scans the various security categories (e.g., App Security, Repository Security, IaC Security, Cloud Security) to identify high-risk areas.

  • Prioritizes categories with the highest number of critical and high-severity vulnerabilities for immediate remediation.

• Cross-Team Coordination:

  • Engages with DevOps, cloud engineers, and security teams to discuss security risks in different domains.

  • Works with developers to fix Code Security and Secrets/PII Security vulnerabilities.

  • Collaborates with Cloud and IaC teams to remediate infrastructure-related vulnerabilities.

• Security Posture Assessment:

  • Uses this dashboard to determine whether vulnerabilities are evenly distributed or if certain areas require urgent intervention.

  • For example, if IaC Security has 16 high-severity vulnerabilities, the engineer focuses on infrastructure security fixes.

• Reporting and Compliance Audits:

  • Uses this visual breakdown to prepare reports for security leadership, compliance teams, and executive stakeholders.

  • Ensures high-risk vulnerabilities (red markers) are resolved before security audits.

---

2. Impact on AppSec Operations

This chart streamlines vulnerability management by enabling:

• Risk-Based Prioritization:

  • Helps security teams focus on the most critical security categories (e.g., Code Security, Secrets Security, IaC Security) rather than treating all vulnerabilities equally.

• Improved Cross-Team Security Alignment:

  • Encourages collaboration between application developers, DevOps, cloud engineers, and security teams.

  • Ensures each domain (App, Code, IaC, Cloud, CI/CD, etc.) has clear accountability for fixing vulnerabilities.

• Faster Remediation Efforts:

  • Categorizing vulnerabilities by security domain allows security teams to tackle issues efficiently without duplicating efforts.

  • Example: Instead of fixing vulnerabilities one by one, the team can roll out bulk fixes in the most affected domain first.

• Security Compliance Readiness:

  • Helps track whether security controls are effective across all domains before an ISO 27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS, or NIST compliance audit.

---

3. What Decisions Does This Chart Drive?

• Which security category should be prioritized for remediation?

  • If Code Security (34 vulnerabilities) and IaC Security (27 vulnerabilities) have the highest number of issues, those areas should be fixed first.

• Are critical vulnerabilities evenly distributed or concentrated in one area?

  • If certain security areas have a disproportionate number of critical risks, teams should investigate systemic security weaknesses in those areas.

• Do we need to allocate more resources to specific security domains?

  • If one area (e.g., Secrets Security) has too many high-risk vulnerabilities, the team might need dedicated security engineers or automated tools.

• Is our current security strategy balanced across all domains?

  • If some categories (e.g., CI/CD Security) have very few vulnerabilities, this could mean:

    • The area is well-protected.

    • Security testing is inadequate, requiring deeper analysis.

• Which teams should take ownership of fixing vulnerabilities?

  • Cloud Security vulnerabilities → Cloud security engineers.

  • Code Security vulnerabilities → Application developers.

  • Secrets/PII vulnerabilities → DevOps or security engineers.